RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 4 May 2005 08:30:35 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
On 5/4/05, Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> don't remember saying that it would stop sloppiness, but rather I
> believe I suggested that it could be used to reduce the incidents of
> sloppiness by practicing some statistical analysis ala TQM. Iron
> Mountain reported that 99.9% of 5 million trips were conducted
> successfully. That translates to 500,000 trips being conducted
> unsuccessfully. Is that an acceptable number? Now of course we don't
> know what they mean by successful, all tapes delivered accurately,
> none lost or that the truck hadn't broken down.

dang it all. you would think I would learn not to handle a calculator
until after the second cup of coffee.

the correct number is 5,000 trips not 500K. But I think my question
still holds true, "is that an acceptable number?" What if you are one
of the 5,000?

--
Peter Kurilecz
Richmond, Va

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2