You are right to be concerned about the KM-RM connections. It does give  rise
to the real possibility of KM needs exceeding current RM disposition
management schedules, and thus the need for possible reappraisal of related
schedules, or notification of KM managers of any legal requirements for their  abiding
by current schedules. At the same time, KM can be much more than a  headache
for RM. There are important advantages of RM allying itself with the KM
program. For more discussion of this, see the RIMR paper, _Managing  Distinctions:
Enterprise Asset, Content, Knowledge ..._
(http://www.mybestdocs.com/barry-r-rimr-distinctions.htm)  in  the Recent Papers section of mybestdocs.com.

Regards,

Rick Barry
_www.mybestdocs.com_ (http://www.mybestdocs.com)
Cofounder, Open Reader Consortium
_www.openreader.org_ (http://www.openreader.org)

>===== Original Message From Records Management Program
<Thu, 16 Jun 2005 10:20:32 -0400
[log in to unmask] (mailto:[log in to unmask]) >  =====
>I am interested in hearing from any firms who have  successfully
>implemented a records retention program along with a  knowledge
>management system.  Our concerns, specifically, involve  the destruction
>of files, as dictated by our records retention program,  that may be
>critical to the knowledge management system.  Thank you  in advance for
>any information you can offer.
>
>List  archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
>Contact  [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance