RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
JESSE WILKINS <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 18:35:33 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (89 lines)
Forwarded from the Storage in the Enterprise mailing list from Network
World. Sign up at http://www.nwwsubscribe.com/Changes.aspx.

Today's focus:  Next steps for e-mail administrators if your company is hit
with a subpoena

By Mike Karp

"Greed is good," said Gordon Gecko in the movie "Wall Street."  Unless, of
course you get caught.

Today, we continue with our look at e-mail archiving issues. Last time, we
covered retention and disposition. Today the topic is archiving as it
pertains to search, discovery and forensics analysis.

In compliance-speak, the term "search, discovery and forensics" refers to a
system's ability to perform legal discovery requests. This should extend
across all the e-mail assets - online, near-line and off-line. Things have
to be findable no matter where they may reside.

Since 2002, financial officers of publicly held businesses have been
required to sign a code of ethics. According to the Sarbanes Oxley Act, this
includes "such standards as are reasonably necessary to promote ...honest
and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent
conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships; full,
fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in the periodic
reports required to be filed by the issuer; and compliance with applicable
governmental rules and regulations."
(Have a secret desire to be a lawyer, or just want to see what your
corporate attorneys are concerned about?  Sarbanes Oxley is yours to enjoy
at <http://www.sec.gov/about/laws/soa2002.pdf> )

Corporate officers wanting to prove they have been free of unethical conduct
should be well on the way to making sure their e-mail archives are up to
snuff. Those who can't prove they have been playing by the rules, well...
good luck to them.

E-mail is so crucial to business communication these days that it is always
part of the subpoena for business records. If your company were hit with a
subpoena, what would your next step be?
In many cases, it would involve the brute force searching of hundreds of
back-up tapes for old e-mail, a process that is both time-consuming and
costly.

Assume your company is being sued, and your corporate legal department has
asked you to provide all records associated with a particular business
transaction. What would you do? Can you make even the broadest estimate as
to what the cost would be, or how much time it would take your team to
discover what the appropriate e-mail records were? Would you even know where
to begin?

If you are an e-mail administrator, what you most likely will want is a
system to capture all content in the Outlook (or Notes) system. This means
more than just the messages and their attachments, it also means capturing
the calendar items, contacts, notes, to-do lists and all the rest of it.
Look for an ability to search intelligently across mailboxes. When it is
time to discover e-mail for investigation, legal support and regulatory
compliance reasons, intelligent searches will be worth their weight in gold
because of the time they save and the accuracy they can deliver. Be warned
however that this means more than simple searches. To help provide your
company's legal team with a complete analysis of mailboxes for forensics,
you will want a system that can follow or reconstruct complex message
threads.

Of course, the cleverest among you will opt for a system that allows the
users themselves (in this case, the legal department) do their own searching
so you can go about your usual IT business. Compliance or legal search,
discovery and forensics functions are typically reserved for people within a
company who are specifically tagged with auditing responsibilities.

Some vendors have mentioned to me that the cost of a single e-mail discovery
would pay for an entire e-mail archive solution. After thinking about the
hours involved in the discovery process, and the financial penalties that
lie in wait for a company that is unable to execute this process accurately
and efficiently, I am starting to believe them.

Your thoughts and comments appreciated.

Jesse Wilkins
CDIA+, LIT, EDP, ICP
IMERGE Consulting
(303) 574-1455 office
(303) 484-4142 fax
[log in to unmask]
Yahoo!:  jessewilkins8511

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2