So, a few comments...
As I don't think one person can effectively develop either a Vision or
Mission Statement, I'm not even going to try, but here's my thoughts as to
what they SHOULD REPRESENT. Unfortunately, I'm not seeing that in either of
what have been drafted.
I'd like to see the Vision reworked a bit... while I agree in principle how
a Mission statement should support a Vision, and as one of the following
sites recommends, a Vision should be a "... vivid description of the
organization as it effectively carries out its operations"
http://www.nsba.org/sbot/toolkit/cav.html
http://www.managementhelp.org/plan_dec/str_plan/stmnts.htm
I'm in agreement with John that the Mission Statement sounds a bit weak, as
items one and 2 are essentially a repetition of each other. Mission
statements in general are rather lofty, and are designed to state why you
exist and what you hope to achieve.
http://www.tgci.com/magazine/98fall/mission.asp
http://www.businessplans.org/Mission.html
While I see a need to draw a distinction between the RIM Profession and the
Professionals in it, I don't see where there should be much of a difference
for ARMA, especially in the Mission Statement. ARMA is a professional
association whose mission should be to serve both, as there would be no
profession if not for the professionals.
From Webster:
*Profession (noun) 4 a* *:* a calling requiring specialized knowledge and
often long and intensive academic preparation *b* *:* a principal calling,
vocation, or employment *c* *:* the whole body of persons engaged in a
calling
The Values proposed seem basically valid, but number three reads more like a
goal than a value. I'd like to see them stated more like:
Supporting our membership is our highest priority
Promotion of the RIM Profession, it's principles and practices
Advancement of the RIM Profession through strategic partnerships and
alliances
Operating the Association in a completely open and transparent manner
The goals should be designed to support achieving the mission.
Goal one seems to be mis-stated, maybe something like:
"Raise awareness regarding the RIM profession within the business and
corporate communities."
For Goal two, I'd see a first step being "Evaluate the tools available to
improve the skills of RIM Professionals"
And for Goal three, I'd prefer to see "ESTABLISH an effective infrastructure
and governance process to achieve strategic objectives", because I don't
think one exists currently.
I'm having a bit of a problem with the "Radar Screen" still, however, I see
a great value in separating the Association Issues from the Professional
Issues, as the manner in which they will be resolved is completely
different. The resources and means required to tackle the two sets of issues
differ in part by the governance structure and in part by what policies need
to be changed to accomplish them.
Need more time than I have right now to comment on these...
Larry
--
Larry Medina
Danville, CA
RIM Professional since 1972
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
|