Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 8 Mar 2006 15:05:20 +1100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Basically, as I've been told by a lawyer, you have to be able to prove (in
the legal meaning of the word, ie in court) that the document (scanned
image) hasn't been fiddled with, during or after scanning. So your job
logs, QA records and procedure manuals etc will establish the integrity of
the process, that no documents went astray, the specified procedure was
followed that day, no-one unauthorised had access to them etc. You also
need to look at the IT side of things, eg if the images sit on a big hard
disc for a few weeks until there are enough to fill a CD, could anyone get
in with Photoshop and fiddle around with one of the images? Could anyone
swap a good CD for a fiddled one?
I suggest you line up all your integrity records, process maps etc and
then ask a lawyer "Could you defend this in court if the original hardcopy
isn't available?"
Cheers
Glenn
Glenn Sanders MRMA
[log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]
Australia
These views are mine alone. They may or may not be those of any
previous or present employers or clients. I don't know. If I'd asked
and they'd agreed, I would have signed it "Harry Peck & Co and
Glenn". Or whatever. But I haven't, so I didn't.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately via return e-mail and then delete the original e-mail. EnergyAustralia has collected your business contact details for dealing with you in your business capacity. More information about how we handle your personal information, including your right of access is contained at http://www.energy.com.au.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
|
|
|