RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Laura Bell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 9 Mar 2006 07:21:59 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
We scan in letters from the public, committee members, Congressional
inquiries and letters from constituents.  So naturally all this
discussion on scanning caught my eye.  Our system keeps track of the
correspondence to the Secretary but makes us scan in interims and
acknowledgements printed and mailed in hard copy at the end of a case.
This does not give us a record of when we actually told someone we
working to get their answers nor will it give us a record when we start
scanning in the old DOT directives (permanent records) for the purpose
of archiving the case file and any changes.  That is unless we keep a
log of the date and a control number with a naming scheme of some sort.
We still do many things in by sneaker net and with original copy but we
don't necessarily document our processes.  Thanks for all the
discussion, the points are good and they help me think of problems.

 

Ms. Laura F. Bell

DOT Directives & Records Management

Office of the Secretary of Transportation

[log in to unmask]

202-366-9761

 


List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2