RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Chris Flynn <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 9 Mar 2006 08:54:07 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (47 lines)
Bill,

Archival scanning

Chris Flynn

-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf
Of Roach, Bill J.
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 6:18 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [RM] scanning question


>>But did you scan copies or originals.<<

It doesn't matter.  I have never seen or heard of a requirement that
suggests that only the original documents be scanned.  If someone has,
please enlighten me.

As a best practice, our organization will make copies of fragile,
damaged or poor quality originals so they can be scanned efficiently.

Bill R

Bill Roach, CRM
Enterprise EDMS Coordinator
State of North Dakota
ITD/Records Management
701-328-3589

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.0/275 - Release Date: 3/6/06

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 268.2.0/275 - Release Date: 3/6/06

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2