RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jay Maechtlen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 16:31:13 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (60 lines)
If you're scanning documents to PDF, it is normally a TIFF in a PDF 
wrapper.
Once in the PDF, it may be harder to OCR it with anything other than 
Acrobat's OCR, which I don't like very much.
However, Acrobat will OCR the PDF more than one way- you can leave the 
text behind the image, present only for search purposes.
I gather that for most purposes, the images don't get OCRd anyway, so 
that's all aside the point.

On the desktop, there are lots of apps that are willing to 'try' to open a 
TIFF.
Many of them don't handle multi-page images at all, and others not well.
Depending on formats and resolution, a TIFF may display at odd aspect 
ratios or with other strangeness.

Only a few apps will open a PDF, and the common ones are pretty reliable. 
From what I've seen, if a PDF is legal, it will display just fine in 
Acrobat Reader.
This means that, for desktop, so there's less liklihood for problems with 
PDF.

For long-term storage, PDF may actually be better than TIFF?

I wouldn't bet much money either way, though.


Jay Maechtlen

Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]> wrote on 03/30/2006 
09:38:35 AM:

> 
> 
> We have been scanning documents for the past 3 years as TIFFs, but
> because of an issue of OCRing a document with color and B&W pages we are
> now considering scanning to PDF.  What is the conventional wisdom on
> TIFF vs PDFs?  Is one more stable, better resolution, better at
> migrating to newer releases, etc.  I have heard mixed reviews with no
> clear "winner" on which is the preferred format.  Your advice is most
> appreciated!  Thanks to all of you who responded to "how far is far
> enough" too!
> 
> Paula Sutton
> 


-----------------------------------------
The information in this email, and any attachments, may contain
confidential information and is intended solely for the attention
and use of the named addressee(s). It must not be disclosed to any
person(s) without authorization. If you are not the intended
recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the
intended recipient, you are not authorized to, and must not,
disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any part of
it. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
the sender immediately.

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2