RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Graham Kitchen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 13 Apr 2006 07:26:16 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (78 lines)
Who did you vote for?

Graham Kitchen
Corporate Records Manager
Unified Western Grocers
5200 Sheila Street
Commerce, CA 90040
Office Phone: (323) 264-5200 ext. 4560
Cell Phone:  (323) 243-1865



-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
Behalf Of Hugh Smith
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 10:38 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: U.S. federal data security bills


> From:    Taina Makinen <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: U.S. federal data security bills
>
> The April Washington Policy Brief=20
> (http://www.arma.org/news/policybrief/index.cfm?BriefID=3D1209) 
> describes=20
> the recent passage of two federal U.S. data security bills (the 
> Financial=20
> Data Protection Act and the Data Accountability and Trust Act). In 
> reading =
>
> articles over the past few months, I've seen concerns about whether 
> the=20
> federal-level data security legislation would be as strict as similar 
> laws =
>
> currently in force in California. Can any listmembers comment on how 
> these =
>
> new federal bills stack up against the California legislation?

Well our Congress has spoken and big business wins and the little guy 
loses. The Republicans and Democrats spent considerable time agonizing 
over just how much graft they could take from the lobbyists for such a 
magnificent prize as making them invulnerable to risk from disclosure 
of our private financial data. So short of you proving in court that 
your banker, hospital, or credit card company deliberately disclosed 
your information for the sole purpose of trying to hurt you 
specifically, this is not consumer friendly.  The risk as always falls 
on us.  The California law was better from the common man's position.

We need a Common Citizen Party because both of the existing parties 
only worry about the wealthy guys interests.  Between this and the 
Immigration Bill I have come to believe that none of these guys really 
love America. Who do these guys think they are serving?

Protecting the records that protect our identity is a real records 
management issue and by looking at how they watered down the 
legislation from California's version to the version they came up with 
shows you whether our congress cares about protecting citizens and the 
money from this criminal activity funds all the wrong types of 
activities.  I warned the List this was in the works and we needed some 
serious letter writing to have an impact.  But now I think it is too 
late.  Our only hope is to take Cheney into Congress bird hunting.  We 
release a few pigeons and let the VP go to work.  Inhumane you say?  
There is no way he is hitting those pigeons! Shoot (no pun intended), 
he barely could hit an attorney.  But a room full of 
attorneys............??

Hugh Smith
(My opinion and mine alone.)

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2