RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Morgan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 12 May 2006 11:24:04 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
The cardboard rolls shouldn't be considered, in this case. The subject
was originally about printed faxes which will have been removed from the
rolls. 


Steve Morgan
C.J. Segerstrom & Sons, Records Manager
[log in to unmask]

-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Jones, Virginia
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 11:09 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Fax Carbon Paper

The problem with this particular type of carbon is that it is rolled up
onto a very thick, very solid (almost solidified) cardboard core which
binds in shredder blades and often breaks or seriously damages them. (I
have had intimate experience with this type of fax machine, not all of
it good.) In general, Janie is correct that carbon paper is not
recyclable and many commercial shredding firms will not take it for that
reason.  I also agree with the many that suggested a change of hardware
should be considered by your client.  But meanwhile, they do have to
deal with the carbons already generated.

Ginny Jones
(Virginia A. Jones, CRM, FAI)
Records Manager
Information Technology Division
Newport News Dept. of Public Utilities
Newport News, VA
[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2