Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 24 May 2006 13:49:16 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Cheri Adams writes:
> Do any of your organizations have a Vital Records Program in place? If
> so, did you classify your vital records into different vital record
> classifications? According to the ARMA International ANSI/ARMA 5-2003
> Vital Records Programs: Identifying, Managing, and Recoverying
> Business-Critical Records publication (ANSI/ARMA 5-2003) they recommend
> doing so with the classifications listed below.
>
> Vital A: Essential for emergency operations.
> Vital B: Essential for immediate resumption and continuation of
> business following a disaster.
> Vital C: Essential for legal or audit purposes.
>
> My organization's legal counsel is questioning the need to classify the
> vital records into different classifications. They feel that only one
> classification is necessary and that is "vital". It's either vital or
> it's not & if it's vital it needs to be backed up. Classifications don't
> matter.
Yes, a vital record is a vital record and needs to be protected.
However, some vital records must also be linked to business continuity
programs. I believe that was the intent of the various classificaitons.
So, rather than determining a degree of 'vitalness,' the classifications
actually define the level of accesibility that that type of vital record
must have.
Obviously, Classes A & B need quicker and easier retrievability when an
emergency or disaster occurs than Class C, and may require a different
manner of preservation to assure that retrievability.
Al
--
Alan A Andolsen CMC CRM
President
Naremco Services Inc.
60 East 42nd Street
New York, NY 10165
Voice: 212-697-0290
Fax: 212-986-1736
MailTo:[log in to unmask]
URL: http://www.naremco.com
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
|
|
|