Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 8 Jun 2006 11:34:17 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Karin M. Hendrickson wrote:
<I had to argue forever with one of our counsel in order to convince him
that a statute of limitations did NOT equal a retention schedule!>
Ah, but sometimes it might. In the absence of business value and
legal/regulatory requirements to keep something, the statute of
limitation might be the best guide to determine appropriate retention.
Particularly in a highly unregulated business (such as a law firm).
I think RM reporting through Legal can make a lot of sense, I also think
RM reporting through IT can make a lot of sense. Just depends.
My personal favorite is when an attorney starts an argument on one side
of an issue, and during the course of discussion, he argues himself to
the other side of the issue. The intellectual equivalent of a dog
chasing his tail ... :)
Julie
Note:
This message and any attachments from the law firm Arnall Golden Gregory LLP may contain CONFIDENTIAL and legally protected information. If you are not the addressee and an intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication to others; also, please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Thank you.
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
|
|
|