Which means, in the case of the statute you cite, that if someone sued an
agency for maintaining their records in an alterable format in violation of
the statute, the agency's illegal records would be admitted against them to
prove the violation. A double whammy! :)
Happy weekend all.
J.
John Montaņa
General Counsel
Cunningham & Montaņa, Inc.
29 Parsons Road
Landenberg PA 19350
610-255-1588
610-255-1558 fax
484-832-3260 mobile
-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of Carrie Fager
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 7:09 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [RM] Keeping records in non-admissible format
While the records may be routinely admitted in court, there are laws out
there that do require conversion processes that produce unalterable images
for governmental agencies.
Louisiana's Public Records statutes include such language, for example
L.R.S. 44:39- Microfilm and electronic digitized records; use as evidence
"...any public records of the state of Louisiana or any of its subdivisions
may utilize any appropriate form of the microphotographic process, or an
electronic digitizing process capable of reproducing an unalterable image of
the original source document, for the recordation, filing, and preservation
of all existing public records, forms, and documents..."
Carrie Fager, CRM, CA, CDIA+
Records Management Officer Statewide
Louisiana State Archives
(225) 925-7552
[log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of John Montaņa
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 5:27 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [RM] Keeping records in non-admissible format
There is no such thing as an inadmissible format. The only requirements for
admission are that the record be:
1. made at or near the time of the event recorded;
2. by a person with knowledge of the transaction, or with information
received by a person with knowledge of the transaction (or in the case of
automatically generated records, by a process that accurately records
details of the transaction);
3. as a record made in the normal course of business;
4. as part of a regular system of records.
There is not a requirement that the record be made in a non-alterable
format. Records made in alterable formats are routinely admitted in court.
John Montaņa
General Counsel
Cunningham & Montaņa, Inc.
29 Parsons Road
Landenberg PA 19350
610-255-1588
610-255-1558 fax
484-832-3260 mobile
-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of Nolene Sherman
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 5:34 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [RM] Keeping records in non-admissible format
I am finding that our IT department has set up (or rather purchased)
several electronic systems to improve productivity and workflow. A
couple of them hold documents in formats that are modifiable. Users want
these as their record copy rather than having to print and file. My
initial reaction is that we don't want to designate any e-docs that are
not kept in a legally admissible format as the official record. The
attorneys posed this scenario: If there is no regulatory or legal
requirement to keep these documents in a particular format, we can
choose for operational reasons to assign these records as the official
copy. If we don't believe we will ever want to produce them in court for
evidence, we should be OK. If the other side requests the documents in
discovery, we say that this is the way we keep them and the fact that
they may not be considered admissible is not really our problem.
Do we have an obligation to keep all company records in a manner that
would be acceptable as evidence? Or if they are just operational records
and would not be a record we would choose to use in our defense, is
whatever manner we choose OK? Are there other issues we have not
considered?
Nolene
Nolene Sherman | Director of Records Management | Standard Pacific Homes
| 949.789.1668 | [log in to unmask]
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
|
