RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Roach, Bill J." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:54:46 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
>>Digital Imaging Guidelines available online<<

Greetings all,

Just a quick question.  Most of the guidelines I have read suggest
scanning and storing documents at 300 dpi.  Just a thought, but I find
this a bit excessive unless there is a good chance that the documents
will be OCR'd in the future.  

We are revising our standard to a standard 200 dpi with even lower dpi
permitted on high quality text documents.  Bandwidth and storage
considerations are two reasons for the move.  Quality of the images is
still very sufficient to meet any evidentiary requirements.  Our forms
processing solution is based on the TIFF G3 standard of 200 dpi and does
an outstanding job of OCR, ICR, OBR and OMR at the 200 dpi range so not
sure I even can justify the 300 dpi setting for OCR purposes.  We write
images from our ECM to a Kodak DAW at both 200 and 300 dpi without
noticing a difference.

Any discussion?

Bill R

Bill Roach, CRM
Enterprise EDMS Coordinator
State of North Dakota
ITD/Records Management
701-328-3589

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2