Kodak has an Archive Writer; writes images to 16mm film.  The archive
writer is not cheap, and the film is very expensive.

Personally I believe there are better options for backup of the info
than film. 

Best regards, Steve
Steven D. Whitaker, CRM
Records Systems Manager; City of Reno

>>> [log in to unmask] 08/17 6:59 AM >>>
I've recently been posing questions concerning electronic imaging to
the
listserv.  We've also been in this discussion about whether microfilm
is
still viable.  Therefore it reminds me of something I'd like to know
more about....which involves both technologies....and maybe this is a
good time to ask!  I hear that there is equipment that will capture
the
"already scanned" electronic images onto microfilm.  What I'm
interested
in is the possibility of capturing the electronic images at "any"
point....perhaps once the electronic records become "inactive" (I'm
thinking in the case of our student files).  Can anyone enlighten me
on
this?  

 

Gus Harris

Univ. of West FL

Pensacola, FL

[log in to unmask] 


List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html 
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance