RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 2 Oct 2006 23:24:30 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
On 10/2/06, White, Bruce <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Call me hard headed (I am part German) - I'm just not sold on the
> concept of a sub-CRM credential, not at this time anyway.  I haven't
> seen any arguments to date which would convince me otherwise (Yes,
> Whitaker and I DO agree on something.)  The accounting profession has
> done extremely well with one credential all these years.  But I speak
> for only myself and not as a board member.


i agree with Bruce on this. CPAs have but one designation. In the
medical profession you are either board certified or not, nothing in
between. Same thing in the legal profession.
In my opinion you are either a Certified Records Manager or you are
not. As to the issue of alphabet soup. I feel the only ones that
really matter are those that require continuing education. everything
else is but a point in time award.

in the world of the ICRM you are either a CRM or a candidate.
-- 
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
Richmond, Va

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2