RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Charles Childress <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:15:57 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (81 lines)
Hey, I resemble that remark!

> From: bobd <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:45:25 -0800
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: RAIN 061210 EDD rules, Bush Library Bid, Local Archivist
> 
> Thank you Peter ... for a second I thought I was on the archives/librarian
> listserv.  
> 
> Bob Dalton, CRM
> Dalton Consulting
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
> Of Peter Kurilecz
> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 9:10 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [RM] RAIN 061210 EDD rules, Bush Library Bid, Local Archivist
> 
> On 12/18/06, Charles Childress <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> "One can only wonder at how carelessly a Bush
>> presidential library will record his administration's
>> trashing of the EPA's archival collection"
>> 
>> I see two possible scenarios here. They are:
>> 
>> 1.  Everything in the Dubya's library will most likely be classified for
> at
>> least 50 to 100 years (if not longer). Even then you'll probably need a
> top
>> secret security clearance just to walk in the front door.
> 
> access to  information at all presidential libraries is limited for a
> variety of reasons. here is a link to the policies in place at the JFK
> library
> 
> http://www.jfklibrary.org/Historical+resources/archives/research+policies.ht
> m
> 
> http://www.clintonlibrary.gov/FAQ.html#restricted
> 
> 
>> 
>> 2. Nothing of any substance will be open to public viewing ever! In fact,
> I
>> would be surprised if anything of any substance was retained at all.
> 
> I seriously doubt that, but then again will we ever learn what Sandy
> Berger removed from the National Archives and why?
> 
> let us not forget  the reckless disregard for privacy rights under the
> previous administration with regards to access to FBI files
> 
> http://www-cgi.cnn.com/US/9606/23/fbi.files/
> 
> or the fact that the previous admin's library was built on big
> business donations also
> 
> http://www.nysun.com/article/5137
> 
> http://www.politicalmoneyline.com/cgi-win/cld.exe?DoFn=
> 
> http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA157387.html
> 
> 
> -- 
> Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
> Richmond, Va
> 
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> 
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2