RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:08:38 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
On 4/27/07, John Annunziello <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> "Would it be sacrilege to suggest that, ...perhaps..., ...
> just perhaps ..., they might ... might ... be better off
> with 20 million$$ rather than 150,000 boxes of old records..."
>
> My thoughts exactly.  I wondered how they attached value to each record
> and what the process was.  Does anyone know?
>

two different methodogies.

EXXONMobil calculated what it would cost to recreate the records in
the boxes. I remember that for one box it would have cost over $11K to
recreate the information in that box.
For ExxonMobil they still needed the information that was on the old records

for the other plaintiff it was more difficult since a lot of the
records were related to trust records.

this is not a case of "gee I wish I had electronic rather than paper"

if you want to read past postings from the archives go to the search page

http://lists.ufl.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=recmgmt-l

and put this (diversified records) in the Search for window and hit enter

you'll get 33 hits

-- 
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
Richmond, Va

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2