This is, as it always is, a fascinating debate.  Of course being an RM
professional I agree that, in theory at least, email should be managed
according to its content just like everything else we attempt to manage.
However, I have a sneaking suspicion that we've lost this battle and
we're going to need a new theory fairly soon.  

Rick Wolf in an earlier message in this thread made this statement 

"The problem will not be solved until organizations make a concerted
effort
to train new hires/employees on email usage, establish central
repositories
for content storage, impose bona fide lifecycles to that content based
on file plans and retention schedules, and establish permissions-based
access to electronically stored information..."

I disagree with that statement.  I think that the problem will not be
solved until the humans that run organisations stop believing they can
restrict and re-train human behaviour.  Much as I would wish it to be
otherwise the fact is that innate human behaviour will win out every
time over training or regulation. As those who read they 21 Technology
flops article in Computerworld will know: many good ideas don't work
simply because people don't take to them and no amount of coercion,
training, or regulating can change that.

I cannot imagine a world in which today's 13-year old is going to be
"trained" to use email in work-appropriate ways so that everything is
neatly stored in central repositories with easily identifiable
life-cycles.  Today's 13-year old has at least a couple of email
accounts, half a dozen instant message accounts and countless social
networking accounts ALL of which they use to communicate. They've grown
up with web 2.0: they're not going to stop doing all this once they hit
the workplace.  

We, or our successors, are going to have to tackle a much bigger problem
than managing email which has been created or received in a
work-supplied email system.  The American Republican Party is already
ahead of its time (?) by not using the White House email system for a
whole load of what some might consider to be work-related
communications; this kind of thing will only grow in the not too distant
future.  

We're going to have to start playing a different song than the old
familiar "the medium doesn't matter: content is king" standby because
that simply won't hold up when our corporate communications are
routinely taking place via web based email accounts (gmail etc) and
where work-related information is being added to (and commented on at) a
plethora of blogs and MySpace pages, and where our corporate photos are
stored on Flickr accounts and our training materials are podcasts stored
only at a third party provider like libsyn.  

Whether we want it to or not we're fast reaching the point where the
medium does matter.

Cheers, Bernadette
 
Bernadette Bean
Records Management Strategist
Finance and Administration Division
Department of Health (South Australian Government)
Email (individual): [log in to unmask]

This e-mail may contain confidential information, which also may be
legally privileged. Only the intended recipient(s) may access, use,
distribute or copy this e-mail. If this e-mail is received in error,
please inform the sender by return e-mail and delete the original. If
there are doubts about the validity of this message, please contact the
sender by telephone. It is the recipient's responsibility to check the
e-mail and any attached files for viruses.

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance