RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Glenn Sanders <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 May 2007 07:28:16 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Mike

Where I used to be: 4,500 staff, highly decentralised, no central file
store: 6 staff - 3 RMers, 3 pushing trolleys

Where I am now: 3,500 staff, less decentralised, building up a central file
store: 10 staff, 5 RMers, 5 pushing trolleys

But it depends heavily on corporate structure, geographic and functional
spread, the extent to which you go fully electronic etc etc. I've seen these
questions over many years now on several listservs and my analysis is there
is no standard, and the only pattern is less and less staff for more and
more work.

Cheers

Glenn

Glenn Sanders MRMA
[log in to unmask]
Australia

These views are mine alone. They may or may not be those of any
previous or present employers or clients. I don't know. If I'd asked
and they'd agreed, I would have signed it "Harry Peck and Co and
Glenn". Or whatever. But I haven't, so I didn't.

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2