Tracey Ann Black wrote:
>I disagree. If your company is doing things correctly in the first place I believe the VIRTUAL cost of keeping records a years or two longer than needed outweighs the ACTUAL cost of keeping half or partial filled boxes. The only RISK would be if you had incrememnating records.
>
> Just my 75 cents!
>
> Diva of Docs
>
>
I don't know about you, but for those of us in the public sector the
retention period is an absolute not a minimum. If one is "keeping
records a years (sic) or two longer than needed" then either the records
program is not working or the retention scedule is wrong. Dick King,
University of Arizona.
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]