RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Gerard J. Nicol" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:33:09 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (55 lines)
Hi,

 

There has been a discussion related to the chain of custody of computer
tapes on another list where I am a subscriber.

 

Given the expertise of this list I thought I might turn here for some input
(actually I turned to Wikipedia first but
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chain_of_custody needs a little work in
relation to non-criminal matters).

 

Anyway, my question to you all is what part if any does the requester of a
record have in the chain of custody given that the requester might not
actually be someone who physically handles the record (or tape in this
instance).

 

By requester I mean the person who requests that a record be moved, either
internally or to or from a third party.

 

Is it necessary to have the requester recorded in the chain of custody for
it to be complete?

If you send a tape off-site or off-site do you expect a record of who or
what made that request?

Should a driver be able to leave with any tapes where he can not show who or
what requested that tape be removed?

 

Gerard Nicol

TapeTrack Pty Ltd

 

 

 


List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2