Thanks for all the great responses to my question about microfilms and
microforms. Got a lot of great information regarding why it is still
very relevant and the preferred medium for permanent retention. Thanks
to all those who responded

Nick Naubert
[log in to unmask]
Seattle, WA

-----Original Message-----
From: John Glover [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 8:27 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Permanent Records - Microfilm

Nick;

Around the globe, microfilm continues to be the preferred preservation
media.
Many US State Archives require permanent records be on some sort of
microform.

Microfiche and microfilm are primarily created today by archive writers
(COM
Recorders) and microfiche and microfilm desktop scanners have replaced
the
old reader/printers.
The equipment to create microfilm and view microfilm is readily
available as
well as the services to convert digital to film and film to digital.

If you need any help with resources please contact me.

Regards;

John

-- 
John R Glover
707-773-1257
[log in to unmask]
www.linkedin.com/in/johnrglover
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Nick Naubert
<[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> I would like to get the communities opinion on something I have come
across
> lately.
>
> As an employee in a sales and consultation role, it is my job to drum
up
> new
> business. I prefer to network rather than cold call, so my approach is
to
> join
> or sponser associations in different industries.
>
> Recently I joined an association relating to Water and Sewer
Districts.
> While
> exhibiting at a recent tradeshow I was taken by surprise by what some
folks
> were telling me in regards to permanent retention. The members relayed
to
> me
> that the State Archivist still requires all permanent records to be
> submitted to
> the state in a microfiche form. The argument being that in a worst
case
> scenario, "we can alway use a flashlight and magnifying lens." I was a
> little
> shocked because we typically think of microfiche as a dead medium and
you
> are lucky if you can find a machine to read them. Most of the calls I
> receive in
> regards to microfiche, is how to get the records off of the film and
into
> more
> relevant forms such as PDF files, or TIFF images. Needless to say I
was
> even
> more surprised when more and more members relayed the same
information.
>
> How does your organization tackle permanent retention records, and is
> microfiche still a preferred medium in the private sector? Can anyone
on
> the
> state level provide some input?
>
> My goal is not to imply the state is doing something wrong, but to get
some
> other's perspective on the practice of continuing to use microfiche
for
> permanent retenion. I'll be the first to admit, I may be out of the
loop on
> this
> one.
>
> Nick Naubert
> [log in to unmask]
> Seattle, WA
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
> present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of
the
> message.
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>



-- 
John R Glover
707-773-1257
[log in to unmask]
www.linkedin.com/in/johnrglover

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already
present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of
the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]