RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:33:32 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
I would make sure to map the ESI to the repository and the gatekeeper. you
need the latter when you need to put the ESI on hold. They will also be
important when it comes time to update your datamap

On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Angel Ramos <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> For electronically stored information (ESI) data maps, is it more valuable
> to map ESI to repositories or custodial gatekeepers?
>

-- 
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA
[log in to unmask]
Richmond, Va
http://twitter.com/RAINbyte
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/
http://paper.li/RAINbyte/rainbyte
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2