I hope you're wrong, Bill.  The DoD 5015.2 lies at the core of what we do as modern Records Management professionals.  Our support for it (or opposition to it) is a critical part of the services we provide our customers.  I'd hate to think there are people out there in our industry who wouldn't want to engage in a productive discussion about it because it's a topic 'too heavy for a Friday'.  

And thanks for forwarding my post to the JITC.  I heard from Jana Gallatin off-line yesterday and I would expect her to post her own comments very soon.  Stay tuned...
___________________
Don Lueders, CRM, CDIA
703-864-6986 (mobile)
[log in to unmask]

-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Manago, Bill
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 2:59 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: On Why I No Longer Support the DoD 5015.2 Standard -

I was waiting to hear from my fellow RM/IG professionals, too.  I did forward the post to the JITC, the DoD entity responsible for 5015.02.  Maybe we will get their perspective. As for me, I tend to agree with most of Don's points.  But maybe this topic is too heavy for a Friday :-) 

Bill Manago, CRM  |  VP, Information Governance Solutions, Autonomy  | HP Software
1.404.648.1210 (pc)  |  954.482.2977 (m)  | [log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]