RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:05:35 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (55 lines)
It goes back to the passage of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 198?. in that
legislation the OMB (Office of Management and Budget) was tasked with
reviewing all agency regulations that had recordkeeping requirements. From
the PRA 44 USC 3507
"The Director may not approve a collection of information for a period in
excess of 3 years.
  (h) (1) If an agency decides to seek extension of the Director's approval
granted for a currently approved collection of information, the agency
shall--
 (A) conduct the review established under section
3506<http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/44/3506>
(c)<http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/44/usc_sec_44_00003506----000-#c>,
including the seeking of comment from the public on the continued need for,
and burden imposed by the collection of information; and"
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/44/3507

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/inforeg/PRAPrimer_04072010.pdf

PRA Submission Form
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/inforeg/83i-fill.pdf

IIRC Donald Skupsky then came up with the default 3 yr retention. If there
was no retention period stated in a regulation then one could assume that
the retention period was 3 years since OBM would grant approvely for a
retention longer than 3 years.

anyway that is the way I remember it

On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Ben Greene <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>
> Anyone know the concrete purposes for why many reporting/operational
> retention periods end up at 3 years?
>


-- 
Peter Kurilecz CRM CA IGP
[log in to unmask]
Dallas, Texas
Save our in-boxes! http://emailcharter.org
http://twitter.com/RAINbyte
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/RAINbyte/
http://paper.li/RAINbyte/rainbyte
http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/archives/
http://pinterest.com/pakurilecz/records-management/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/peterakurilecz
Information not relevant for my reply has been deleted to reduce the
electronic footprint and to save the sanity of digest subscribers

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2