RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
RAINDrop - Does the 153-year-old Government Printing Office need a digital-era name?
From:
Bruce White <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 15:47:11 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines) 
From today's WaPo...

<snip>The Senate may vote soon on a bipartisan
bill<https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/s1947>that would give
the 153-year-old Government Printing Office a new name to
better reflect its digital-age work.

The legislation, sponsored by Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and Saxby
Chambliss (R-Ga.), would swap the word “printing” for “publishing” to make
the agency the Government Publishing Office. It also would change the top
two GPO officials’ titles from “public printer” and “deputy public printer”
to ”director” and “deputy director.”<snip>
http://wapo.st/1mkgrBV

Bruce White, CRM, PMP
Virginia Beach, VA
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/bblanco


*"Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep
moving." -- Albert Einstein*

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
To unsubscribe from this list, click the below link. If not already present, place UNSUBSCRIBE RECMGMT-L or UNSUB RECMGMT-L in the body of the message.
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2