RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 13 Dec 2004 07:51:03 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (134 lines)
Sounds like a step backwards...

Best regards, Steve
Steven D. Whitaker, CRM
Records Systems Manager; City of Reno

>>> [log in to unmask] 12/10/04 08:01PM >>>
Shari ...

I believe you would find that the "best practice" to print out the
electronic record and file is probably appropriate.  You can check
other
government agencies to see how they address the problem.  I know that
the
State of Washington has the same policy (or at least the current
manual
reflects it) for electronic records.  It is in their Records
Management
Guidelines for Local Government Agencies of Washington State).  You
can
download from the State Archives

http://www.secstate.wa.gov/archives/records_management.aspx

Then goto General Retention Schedule, then open the Local Government
document, Page 27 thru about 32 I believe.  Gives you some very good
guidance.

Liability:  I'm not a lawyer, but my guess would be none.  My guess
would be
the city lawyers would receive or should receive notice, then inform
you or
depending how they establish their process, notify the individuals who
have
the records to produce and/or keep safe.  My guess you don't manage the
city
electronic records, so if the city lawyer sends the request to you,
you
would request the records be produced by the technology people who are
managing the electronic records and the user (who sent and/or received
the
documents).  They have to produce, you don't.  If they don't have,
they
would have to explain why they didn't maintain in accordance with the
policy.  Your job in this case is training on the policy.   Frankly,
you may
have the responsibility as "records custodian", but you don't have the
authority to manage the records (I personally don't think many
"records
custodian's do).

Your not "chicken little", you have informed the responsible people
(city
administration, lawyers, and technology group) of the requirements.

Keep a CYA/SYA file and keep bringing pertinent information to the
people
who are in charge.  They have their heads in the sand.  It's a never
ending
job.

Good Luck...

Robert W. Dalton, CRM
Dalton Consulting


-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf
Of Shari Coughenour
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 1:41 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Electronic Discovery - e-mail practices

Our computer tech committee decided that the best practice is to print
out
"important" e-mails and file. Our attorney has been directed to write
a
policy on this premise. I will suggest to our attorney to include
language
that the records need to be identified and filed by topic/relative
nature
following the retention schedule.  My first question to the list is as
"records custodian" what liability would I personally have due to this
policy if we're directed by a court to submit electronic records that
we
don't have?

Our city has decided that they're willing to accept the risk of not
keeping
electronic information past the length of the backup tape recycle
time.
I've forwarded the list's information regarding the e-mail best
practices
thread of a week or so ago to the city administrator, city attorney
and
technology person in hopes of enlightening them. They perceive me as
chicken
little, proclaiming "the sky is falling in". Perhaps they don't
perceive the
risk or they are willing to assume the risk.  I had a risk/benefit
conversation with my immediate supervior, the city administrator and he
told
me that e-discovery isn't relative to our city. My second question: Am
I
really chicken little?  I'm thinking the city is not exempt from
lawsuits or
a discovery order. In fact, we do have a lawsuit brewing relating to a
land
deal. Fortunately, I've not any e-mails regarding this other than some
records requests for minutes of meetings, which requests are transitory
in
nature and not kept.
Thanks for your feedback.


Shari Coughenour, CMC
City Clerk
City of Marshalltown
24 N. Center Street
641-754-5701 ph
641-754-5717 fax
[log in to unmask]

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2