Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 13 Dec 2004 11:01:36 -0800 |
In-Reply-To: |
<!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAC4AAAAAAAAAiJUvYfWDP0O
FeJRZcLbsagEAzxBVIN82B0quXcw5Wk2lGAAAABUCBAAAEAAAAOsOswKrbshCqiefQ8WrmLk
[log in to unmask]> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 08:36 AM 12/10/2004 +0800, you wrote:
>We're doing it here. And I welcome it, although it does mean I have to
>remember more passwords. (And that includes Administrator passwords I have
>to remember).
>
>But I've been doing something similar for my private passwords anyway. I
>try to use different passwords for things of low, medium and high security,
>and have more than one in each category.
A common practice is to use a family of passwords, like varieties of trees,
types of dogs, counties on a continent, counties in a state, and for
numbers, use of past addresses, zip codes, phone numbers of family
members... and if it's alphanumeric, license plates work pretty well.
Larry
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
|
|
|