RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
David Gaynon <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 08:24:06 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
I know that it is an article of faith that retention is driven by an
analysis of function, use, and content.  What if just to be contrary I
suggest that retention should be managed by exception.  First identify the
record series you are legally required to preserve add a few  more that you
want to keep as a part of your strategy  for your business model, tax
requirements, litigation, regulatory environment.  Then assign a relatively
short retention for the rest -- say 3 years.  And automate your system so
everything and I mean everything is gone in that period.  For hard copy
don't let anyone send anything to hard copy storage except for the
categories you have identified.

I am not sure that I agree with this 100% but I think there are time for
rethinking some of our basic assumptions.

Dave Gaynon,CRM

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2