RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
JESSE WILKINS <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:09:37 -0700
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (199 lines)
Hi Brian, (Peter?)

Link doesn't seem to be working - and I'd have to see the change in context
to know how to approach this matter.

Willing to review/comment, need the link,

Jesse Wilkins
CDIA+, LIT, EDP, ICP
IMERGE Consulting
(303) 574-1455 office
(303) 484-4142 fax
[log in to unmask]
http://www.imergeconsult.com

>From: "Starck, Brian" <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Help,              need amunition to defeat the worst possible
>public records              legislation EVER proposed!
>Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:59:18 -0700
>
>Good morning all!!  I'm usually a lurker but I'm posting this from the CRM
>listserv to the records management listserv for Janie Wait with her
>permission.  I've read the changes in the policy below and while they seem
>well intentioned I don't think the legslators have thought through this
>one.  In another post to the CRM Listserv Janie said that  "State Archives
>was NOT consulted about or informed of this legislation being proposed",
>but they are now in the process of reviewing it and "are involved in trying
>to rewrite the bill to something that integrates reasonable records
>management practices at the very least."  I think the intent of the
>proposed changes are good but the wording and ramifications of these
>changes were not completely thought through.
>
>         -----Original Message-----
>         From: Janie Wait [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>         Sent: Wed 1/26/2005 9:30 AM
>         To: [log in to unmask]
>         Cc:
>         Subject: [ICRM-L] Help, need amunition to defeat the worst
>possible public records legislation EVER proposed!
>
>
>
>         Dear Fellow CRM's,
>
>         I need your help.  A totally uninformed rookie legislator has
>proposed
>         changing the current public records policy for the State of
>Wyoming by
>         deleting the word "microfilm" and replacing it with "current state
>of the
>         art technology" with NO other changes!!!!
>
>         http://legisweb.state.wy.us/2005/introduced/hb270.pdf
>
>
>
>         Some of my comments to the elected officials.
>
>         I just received a copy of House Bill No. HB0270 and it chills my
>         professional bones.  I cannot even conceive of letting this bill
>go through
>         as written.
>
>         The fact is this bill gives statutory right of individual elected
>officials
>         the make decisions that could compromise Wyoming's current and
>future
>         recorded history.  Why would anyone sponsor such a  bill without
>getting a
>         basic records management background or consulting with State of
>Wyoming
>         Archives to find out WHY the current statutes are written as they
>are.
>
>         If we are going to to allow the "latest state of the art
>technology" to be
>         implemented then there had better be procedures attached to insure
>it's
>         success.
>
>         The primary goal of media conversion is to preserve a body of
>information
>         generated or collected by  different entities such as yourselves.
>If you
>         lose track of information anywhere along the life cycle, you
>expose yourself
>         and your business or agency to unimaginable trauma and risk.
>Granted it is
>         important that you control the growth of records in order to
>reduce
>         operating costs and improve efficiency and productivity for the
>end users
>         but not at the risk of losing the information.  We have to
>remember that
>         when we introduce new technologies that we assure compliance with
>laws and
>         regulations as well as safeguard vital information.  Our intention
>is to
>         support better management decision-making with all relevant
>information and
>         preserve documents for business and research purposes.
>
>         That being said, I intend to get some of the the information
>needed to make
>         this bill work to each of you so you can rewrite it or kill it
>until you can
>         get some relevant education about the industry and the
>unimaginable risk you
>         are taking with this bill! To that end I intend to email you every
>day until
>         you have time to respond to my concerns!
>
>         To which I got back the following:
>
>         I support this bill. I think it is a good bill and I disagree with
>your
>         statements. I am, however, not closed to hearing your information
>on the
>         bill. Forward me what you have and I will read it.
>         Thank you,
>         Representative Bryan Pedersen
>
>
>         I thought to start with these two articles from
>nwww.edocmagazine.com
>         oMedia considerations for Record Retention and Archiving
>         nJack Scott, September/October 2002
>         o
>         The Danger of Digital
>         nAndy Lawrence November/December 2001
>         PLEASE LET ME KNOW OF ANY ARTICLES, RESEARCH, OR OTHER SOURCES OF
>UNBIASED
>         INFORMATION THAT I CAN FORWARD TO THIS GENTLEMEN TO MAKE HIM
>REALIZE THAT
>         RECORDS MANAGEMENT IS NOT A THROW AWAY CONCEPT AND BAD MANAGEMENT
>CAN HAVE
>         HUGE CONSEQUENCES.
>
>         Janie  Wait
>
>
>         Janie Wait, CRM, MBA
>         President
>         Director of Marketing
>         Intermountain Record Center, Inc
>         3765 Airport Parkway, Casper, WY 82604
>         PO Box 2770, Mills, WY 82644
>         307-265-9553
>         307-237-8225
>         [log in to unmask]
>         www.irc-wyo.com
>
>         [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>         Copyright: the original sender of this post owns the copyright on
>it. You must seek and obtain his or her permission before using it anywhere
>except on the list itself.To change your subscription to daily digest mode,
>send a blank message to: [log in to unmask]
>
>         To put your email message delivery on hold for a group, send a
>blank message to: [log in to unmask]
>
>         To change your subscription to individual emails, send a blank
>message to:
>         [log in to unmask]
>         bscription to individual emails, send a blank message to:
>         [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   _____
>
>
>         Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>         *       To visit your group on the web, go to:
>                 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ICRM-L/
>
>         *       To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>                 [log in to unmask]
><mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>
>         *       Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
>of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
>
>List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
>Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2