RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
base64
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Starck, Brian" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:15:29 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Sorry about that.  Let's try this again.
 
http://legisweb.state.wy.us/2005/Introduced/HB0270.pdf
 
<http://legisweb.state.wy.us/2005/introduced/hb270.pdf>  
 

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: JESSE WILKINS [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
	Sent: Thu 1/27/2005 10:09 AM 
	To: [log in to unmask] 
	Cc: 
	Subject: Re: Help, need amunition to defeat the worst possible public records legislation
	
	

	Hi Brian, (Peter?)
	
	Link doesn't seem to be working - and I'd have to see the change in context
	to know how to approach this matter.
	
	Willing to review/comment, need the link,
	
	Jesse Wilkins
	CDIA+, LIT, EDP, ICP
	IMERGE Consulting
	(303) 574-1455 office
	(303) 484-4142 fax
	[log in to unmask]
	http://www.imergeconsult.com
	
	>From: "Starck, Brian" <[log in to unmask]>
	>Reply-To: Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
	>To: [log in to unmask]
	>Subject: Help,              need amunition to defeat the worst possible
	>public records              legislation EVER proposed!
	>Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:59:18 -0700
	>
	>Good morning all!!  I'm usually a lurker but I'm posting this from the CRM
	>listserv to the records management listserv for Janie Wait with her
	>permission.  I've read the changes in the policy below and while they seem
	>well intentioned I don't think the legslators have thought through this
	>one.  In another post to the CRM Listserv Janie said that  "State Archives
	>was NOT consulted about or informed of this legislation being proposed",
	>but they are now in the process of reviewing it and "are involved in trying
	>to rewrite the bill to something that integrates reasonable records
	>management practices at the very least."  I think the intent of the
	>proposed changes are good but the wording and ramifications of these
	>changes were not completely thought through.
	>
	>         -----Original Message-----
	>         From: Janie Wait [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
	>         Sent: Wed 1/26/2005 9:30 AM
	>         To: [log in to unmask]
	>         Cc:
	>         Subject: [ICRM-L] Help, need amunition to defeat the worst
	>possible public records legislation EVER proposed!
	>
	>
	>
	>         Dear Fellow CRM's,
	>
	>         I need your help.  A totally uninformed rookie legislator has
	>proposed
	>         changing the current public records policy for the State of
	>Wyoming by
	>         deleting the word "microfilm" and replacing it with "current state
	>of the
	>         art technology" with NO other changes!!!!
	>
	>         http://legisweb.state.wy.us/2005/introduced/hb270.pdf
	>
	>
	>
	>         Some of my comments to the elected officials.
	>
	>         I just received a copy of House Bill No. HB0270 and it chills my
	>         professional bones.  I cannot even conceive of letting this bill
	>go through
	>         as written.
	>
	>         The fact is this bill gives statutory right of individual elected
	>officials
	>         the make decisions that could compromise Wyoming's current and
	>future
	>         recorded history.  Why would anyone sponsor such a  bill without
	>getting a
	>         basic records management background or consulting with State of
	>Wyoming
	>         Archives to find out WHY the current statutes are written as they
	>are.
	>
	>         If we are going to to allow the "latest state of the art
	>technology" to be
	>         implemented then there had better be procedures attached to insure
	>it's
	>         success.
	>
	>         The primary goal of media conversion is to preserve a body of
	>information
	>         generated or collected by  different entities such as yourselves.
	>If you
	>         lose track of information anywhere along the life cycle, you
	>expose yourself
	>         and your business or agency to unimaginable trauma and risk.
	>Granted it is
	>         important that you control the growth of records in order to
	>reduce
	>         operating costs and improve efficiency and productivity for the
	>end users
	>         but not at the risk of losing the information.  We have to
	>remember that
	>         when we introduce new technologies that we assure compliance with
	>laws and
	>         regulations as well as safeguard vital information.  Our intention
	>is to
	>         support better management decision-making with all relevant
	>information and
	>         preserve documents for business and research purposes.
	>
	>         That being said, I intend to get some of the the information
	>needed to make
	>         this bill work to each of you so you can rewrite it or kill it
	>until you can
	>         get some relevant education about the industry and the
	>unimaginable risk you
	>         are taking with this bill! To that end I intend to email you every
	>day until
	>         you have time to respond to my concerns!
	>
	>         To which I got back the following:
	>
	>         I support this bill. I think it is a good bill and I disagree with
	>your
	>         statements. I am, however, not closed to hearing your information
	>on the
	>         bill. Forward me what you have and I will read it.
	>         Thank you,
	>         Representative Bryan Pedersen
	>
	>
	>         I thought to start with these two articles from
	>nwww.edocmagazine.com
	>         oMedia considerations for Record Retention and Archiving
	>         nJack Scott, September/October 2002
	>         o
	>         The Danger of Digital
	>         nAndy Lawrence November/December 2001
	>         PLEASE LET ME KNOW OF ANY ARTICLES, RESEARCH, OR OTHER SOURCES OF
	>UNBIASED
	>         INFORMATION THAT I CAN FORWARD TO THIS GENTLEMEN TO MAKE HIM
	>REALIZE THAT
	>         RECORDS MANAGEMENT IS NOT A THROW AWAY CONCEPT AND BAD MANAGEMENT
	>CAN HAVE
	>         HUGE CONSEQUENCES.
	>
	>         Janie  Wait
	>
	>
	>         Janie Wait, CRM, MBA
	>         President
	>         Director of Marketing
	>         Intermountain Record Center, Inc
	>         3765 Airport Parkway, Casper, WY 82604
	>         PO Box 2770, Mills, WY 82644
	>         307-265-9553
	>         307-237-8225
	>         [log in to unmask]
	>         www.irc-wyo.com
	>
	>         [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
	>
	>
	>
	>         Copyright: the original sender of this post owns the copyright on
	>it. You must seek and obtain his or her permission before using it anywhere
	>except on the list itself.To change your subscription to daily digest mode,
	>send a blank message to: [log in to unmask]
	>
	>         To put your email message delivery on hold for a group, send a
	>blank message to: [log in to unmask]
	>
	>         To change your subscription to individual emails, send a blank
	>message to:
	>         [log in to unmask]
	>         bscription to individual emails, send a blank message to:
	>         [log in to unmask]
	>
	>
	>
	>
	>
	>
	>   _____
	>
	>
	>         Yahoo! Groups Links
	>
	>
	>         *       To visit your group on the web, go to:
	>                 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ICRM-L/
	>
	>         *       To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
	>                 [log in to unmask]
	><mailto:[log in to unmask]>
	>
	>         *       Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
	>of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
	>
	>List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
	>Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
	
	List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
	Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
	


ATOM RSS1 RSS2