it's not unreasonable to expect that he
has honed the search criteria down to a nicety. It's also not
unreasonable to think that he can share as much or as little of his work
product as he chooses

          I agree. I support editorial privilege.

          I support critique of the use of editorial privilege. In
          this instance it is certain that there is the right to
          decline a direct answer to an enquiry about how it's done. I
          reflect on the interpretation of that where it is likely it
          would have been answered had an enquiry been made by someone
          else. And that may have happened. The prejudice was apparent
          in the unprofessional writing designed as an attack rather
          than as the kind of response expected of a CRM or a CA.

          Peter Kurilecz indicated that he wrote the details already,
          that a search of archives would turn it up.

          Neither the http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
          archives search mechanism nor the
          http://listserv.muohio.edu/archives/archives.html archives
          search mechanism turned up the previous details yet.

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance