RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Piotrowski, Charles" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 24 Mar 2005 08:15:14 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (50 lines)
Hi,

 

I was RAINing this morning (although it is really snowing in VT) and
clicked through the following article: 

 

MOVING towards a paperless world

IT AsiaOne - Singapore,Singapore
...<http://it.asia1.com.sg/newsdaily/news001_20050323.html>"

 

 

In the article it refers to a PWC study:

 

"A PricewaterhouseCoopers study found that in an average organisation,
19 copies of each document are made. The organisation will also spend
US$20 on labour costs to file each document. If the document is
mis-filed, it will cost another US$120 in labour costs to search for the
misfiled document. The study also found that one out of every 20
documents is lost. This in turn leads to an additional 25 hours to
recreate the document. Overall, an average of 400 hours per year are
spent searching for lost files."

 

 

Questions to the group:

Is this the mysterious PWC report of legend? Or is this something new?

 

Thanks,

- Chuck Piotrowski

 

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2