RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252
Date:
Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:17:20 -0400
Reply-To:
Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
On Apr 6, 2005 11:39 AM, Barry Malone <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Attorney Skupsky has stated in the past that a three year presumption of
> retention is acceptable if none can be found.

When it comes to federal retention requirements. this assumption does
not apply to state retention requirements.

the citation (for those who are interested) is 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)(iv)
which states

"(2) Unless the agency is able to demonstrate, in its submission for
OMB clearance, that such characteristic of the collection of
information is necessary to satisfy statutory requirements or other
substantial need, OMB will not approve a collection of information—

(iv) Requiring respondents to retain records, other than health,
medical, government contract, grant-inaid, or tax records, for more
than three years;"



--
Peter Kurilecz
Richmond, Va

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2