Why would any organization have documents that are not covered on the
retention policy schedules?

Best regards, Steve
Steven D. Whitaker, CRM
Records Systems Manager; City of Reno

>>> [log in to unmask] 04/06/05 07:35AM >>>
Good morning all!  It's been a few years since I've posted to this
site,
but have continued to "lurk" since I learn so much!  My question this
time is about all those documents not covered by a retention schedule.
My manager seems to remember a "2-year rule" -- a procedure that says
documents not covered by a retention schedule must be destroyed after
2
years.  Does anyone have any input about such a rule or do you have a
policy in place that requires something similar?  Thank you for any
information you can provide!


Barb Weaver
PPL Corporation
Analyst, Document Management Services
610-774-5239
[log in to unmask]



__________________________________________________

The information contained in this message is intended only for the
personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the
reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that you have received this document in error and that any
review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance