RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date:
Sat, 7 May 2005 16:35:14 -0400
Reply-To:
Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Peter Kurilecz <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
On 5/7/05, Hugh Smith <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Public disclosure of this loss should have been made immediately.  Even
> with the
> California Law requiring public disclosure within 48 hours certain
> executives arrogantly
> refused to disclose the loss of information that could destroy
> thousands of hard working
> individual's credit standing.


Sorry Hugh but several of these were asked by law enforcement agencies
to NOT reveal the breach. California Cyber Security requires companies
to reveal security breaches immediately UNLESS law enforcement says
don't

pak
--
Peter Kurilecz
Richmond, Va

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2