RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 25 May 2005 15:57:17 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
You cannot consider it as a "possibility" or the organization would
have
to place nearly every record series on hold.  Pending or strongly
anticipated
would warrant it though.

Best regards, Steve
Steven D. Whitaker, CRM
Records Systems Manager; City of Reno

>>> [log in to unmask] 05/25/05 02:04PM >>>
I'm in the process of working with the legal department on a
new/updated
legal hold process and have a pretty basic question to ask.   I know
that
destructions and holds must be put in place when the possibility exists
of
litigation- not just when the action is received BUT what type
things/situations/actions take place that should raise the red flag
that
litigation is imminent?   Am I naive to think that most legal action
seems
to come out of the blue for most employee's?

It's gotta be 5 O'Clock SOMEWHERE  !!!!


Steve

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2