Steve,  What type of actions(at the employee level) would raise the flag
if litigation is strongly anticipated.  Thanks for the correction- You're
right.


Steve



Steven Whitaker <[log in to unmask]>
Sent by: Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
05/25/2005 05:57 PM
Please respond to
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>


To
[log in to unmask]
cc

Subject
Re: Legal Hold Question






You cannot consider it as a "possibility" or the organization would
have
to place nearly every record series on hold.  Pending or strongly
anticipated
would warrant it though.

Best regards, Steve
Steven D. Whitaker, CRM
Records Systems Manager; City of Reno

>>> [log in to unmask] 05/25/05 02:04PM >>>
I'm in the process of working with the legal department on a
new/updated
legal hold process and have a pretty basic question to ask.   I know
that
destructions and holds must be put in place when the possibility exists
of
litigation- not just when the action is received BUT what type
things/situations/actions take place that should raise the red flag
that
litigation is imminent?   Am I naive to think that most legal action
seems
to come out of the blue for most employee's?

It's gotta be 5 O'Clock SOMEWHERE  !!!!


Steve

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance