Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 8 Jun 2005 07:28:59 -0700 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Charis,
I like the term "Retention and Disposition Schedule" as most I've seen, and all that I've developed do both: they identify how long a record series has to be kept, and also how to disposition it once that retention has been met. I agree with what you said about non-records people misinterpreting a "Disposition Schedule."
Some folks now refer to retention schedules as "File Plans," which is interesting because it is not necessarily a plan for filing records--at least I don't see it that way. What's funny is that some of the clients I've had who use that term have a variety of filing systems within their organizations, none of which appeared to mirror their schedules.
This reminds me of how people--even records managemetn types, interchange the terms records center, file room, off site storage, and archives. As a consultant who has been around for awhile, it's been challenging enough for me to hear people use these terms that I've gone back to my handy-dandy RM glossary to make sure I remember the differences between them.
Earl
Earl Johnson, Jr.
Sr. Consultant
Millican & Associates
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message--including attachments, may contain confidential or proprietary information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
---------------------------------
Discover Yahoo!
Get on-the-go sports scores, stock quotes, news & more. Check it out!
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
|
|
|