Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Aug 2005 14:50:26 -0700 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Is it me or does it seem that this years conference is very quiet. I
> remember in years past receiving literature from vendors and special
> sections in Records Managers magazines building up to the conference. Not
> a complaint, however it does seem quiet as we head into our 50th
> Anniversary. Anyone agree/disagree.
I have to agree, and I have mixed emotions.
1) I'm glad I'm not receiving a bunch of additional mailings from ARMA,
especially since I'm already registered and they KNOW I'm coming. In the
past, they had a 3rd party doing these mailings for them and they apparently
weren't communicating when someone had registered, because for New Orleans,
I received 11 copies of the Conference brochure. For Boston, only 10....for
Long Beach, only 7 =)
2) I'm betwixt and between about not receiving as many vendor mailings,
because it gave me advance notice about product offerings that would be
there and I could partially plan my show floor visit, but it also meant that
ARMA was telling these vendors I was coming, and from a privacy perspective,
that shouldn't have been happening
So... even with it being the 50th, I'm not displeased about the lack of
mailbox fodder
Larry
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
|
|
|