Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Aug 2005 07:20:32 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Kenneth,
A Modern alternative to Halon...(which I believe is not only ozone
depleting but a biohazard to humans if released) can be found here.
The 3M product is also lower in cost than modern FM-200 (FE-227)
suppression gases.
3M Novec
http://cms.3m.com/cms/US/en/2-68/iclcrFR/view.jhtml
Regards,
Michael Marchand
VeriTrust - VP Operations
www.veritrust.net
On 8/18/05, Walters, Kenneth <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Good Afternoon Listserv members,
>
>
> Are there any legal requirements for Records Centers to have an halon
> fire protection system installed to protect records in the event of a
> fire? Does it vary from state to state? The law firm that I am employed
> with is located in Washington, DC and Irvine California. We currently
> have several decentralized records departments throughout the Firm. Most
> of the decentralized records departments does not have halon fire
> protection, which is a major concern for me in regards to disaster
> recovery and other potential liabilities for the Firm.
>
> I am currently working on an proposal to centralize all of our records
> functions into one centralized location. Besides other obvious reasons
> for centralization, If there are legal requirements to have a halon fire
> system in place, it would be a tremendous selling point that I can
> incorporate into my proposal. Any information you can provide will be
> greatly appreciated. Thanks.
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
>
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
|
|
|