RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date:
Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:55:55 +1300
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Chris Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (49 lines)
I think this model is helpful to end users for understanding electronic records. These records tend not to be moved through the stages of for example active, semi-active, inactive the way we may do with paper records. An electronic record available on-line is just a record: the ideas of active, semi active, inactive are unlikely to be very relevant to it. The continuum idea brings out the need to think carefully about the record and its use and access from the point of creation. It also gives records people a hook to say: We need to be in on this thing from the word go, not just some time down the track when it becomes 'semi-active'.

Thanks

Chris Campbell
[log in to unmask]

>>> [log in to unmask] 11/25/05 09:28a.m. >>>
Paul

My experience is that the continuiuiuiuum model may be a useful tool for 
RM folks, but end users, who earn the money to pay the salaries of RM 
folks, are not interested. They do understand the concept of life cycle 
(explains retention and disposal), and half life (explains when to move to 
secondary storage). They also understand that life cycle is a 
generalisation and there will be variations and exceptions in specific 
cases. 

Valid though the continuum model may be, and useful though it may be for 
me, in planning and managing, it is too specialised for our customers.

Maybe it's (wait for it, drum roll . . . ) too academic? 

Cheers
 
Glenn

Glenn Sanders MRMA
[log in to unmask] 
[log in to unmask] 
Australia

These views are mine alone. They may or may not be those of any
previous or present employers or clients. I don't know. If I'd asked
and they'd agreed, I would have signed it "Harry Peck and Co and
Glenn". Or whatever. But I haven't, so I didn't.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information.   If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately via return e-mail and then delete the original e-mail. EnergyAustralia has collected your business contact details for dealing with you in your business capacity. More information about how we handle your personal information, including your right of access is contained at http://www.energy.com.au.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html 
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2