RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Welch, Miranda" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 25 Nov 2005 00:23:09 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (59 lines)
Actually I agree with you Glen - I do not try and explain the records continuum to my clients - the lifecycle model is a far easier concept to explain and for them to understand.

Miranda Welch
BearingPoint New Zealand


-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
Behalf Of Glenn Sanders
Sent: 25 November 2005 09:29
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Records Continuum Model


Paul

My experience is that the continuiuiuiuum model may be a useful tool for
RM folks, but end users, who earn the money to pay the salaries of RM
folks, are not interested. They do understand the concept of life cycle
(explains retention and disposal), and half life (explains when to move to
secondary storage). They also understand that life cycle is a
generalisation and there will be variations and exceptions in specific
cases.

Valid though the continuum model may be, and useful though it may be for
me, in planning and managing, it is too specialised for our customers.

Maybe it's (wait for it, drum roll . . . ) too academic?

Cheers

Glenn

Glenn Sanders MRMA
[log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]
Australia

These views are mine alone. They may or may not be those of any
previous or present employers or clients. I don't know. If I'd asked
and they'd agreed, I would have signed it "Harry Peck and Co and
Glenn". Or whatever. But I haven't, so I didn't.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information.   If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately via return e-mail and then delete the original e-mail. EnergyAustralia has collected your business contact details for dealing with you in your business capacity. More information about how we handle your personal information, including your right of access is contained at http://www.energy.com.au.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

***************************************************************************************************
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged.  Access to this email by anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized.  If you are not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you are not the intended recipient, please reply to or forward a copy of this message to the sender and delete the message, any attachments, and any copies thereof from your system.
***************************************************************************************************

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2