LISTSERV - RECMGMT-L Archives - LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

	LISTSERV Archives
	RECMGMT-L Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Condense Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Content-Transfer-Encoding:	8bit
Sender:	Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:	Re: 2 Miscellaneous Issues
From:	"Roach, Bill J." <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Tue, 6 Dec 2005 14:17:30 -0600
Content-Type:	text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (21 lines)

>> Secondly, can someone in the utility industry please tell me what the
FERC retention schedule period "Do." means.<<
>>In what context are you seeing "do"? <<

Both Michelle and Chuck are right.  Prior to 2000, "Do." in the FERC
regs meant "Ditto".  Check out this 2000 version of 18 CFR 125.3 for an
example:
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/get-cfr.cgi?TITLE=18&PART=125&SE
CTION=3&YEAR=2000&TYPE=TEXT

However, current regulations have eliminated the use of "Do." and
replaced it with specific timeframes.  The term "DO" is not found but is
spelled out as "Destroy at Option".  The 2005 version can be seen at:
http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/01apr20051500/edocket.access.gpo
.gov/cfr_2005/aprqtr/18cfr125.3.htm

Bill R

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.IGGURU.US