Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:18:16 -0700 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Another point to remember here is that if you are only going to replace
the removed records with a plant, what have you really accomplished?
Graham Kitchen
Corporate Records Manager
Unified Western Grocers
5200 Sheila Street
Commerce, California 90040
Telephone: (323)264-5200 Extension 4560
Cell: (323)243-1865
email: [log in to unmask]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Records Management Program
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of WALLIS Dwight D
> Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 11:30 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Cost of storage
>
> Doug - just a word of caution for folks on your cost
> allocation comment.
> When comparing a cost allocation numbers, you want to make
> sure you are
> comparing apples and apples. Cost allocation formula are not
> necessarily
> unit pricing systems. For example, a cost allocation based square
> footage cost may not compare to a unit price to store a cubic foot
> charged by a commercial records center (this is where that
> fuzzy "usage"
> stuff begins to play a role). The unit price component for square
> footage within that cost allocation formula may work. Or, the cost
> allocation figure would work if both the active and inactive storage
> areas are utilizing the same cost allocation formula.
> Understanding the
> allocation formula helps ensure apple to apple comparisons.
>
> The reason I point this out is the cost allocation may be supporting
> functions not directly tied to facility square footage (for
> example, an
> overall property management function). Changing a storage cost from a
> cost allocation based square footage charge to a unit pricing based
> storage charge may save direct costs, but end up increasing the
> remaining square footage charge due to the need to continue to support
> the supported function. In other words, you may not save the money you
> think you will.
>
> Dwight Wallis, CRM
> Records Administrator
> Multnomah County Fleet, Records, Electronics, Distribution & Stores
> (FREDS)
> 1620 SE 190th Avenue
> Portland OR 97233
> phone: (503)988-3741
> fax: (503)988-3754
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
>
List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
|
|
|