RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Graham Kitchen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:18:16 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (64 lines)
Another point to remember here is that if you are only going to replace
the removed records with a plant, what have you really accomplished?

Graham Kitchen
Corporate Records Manager
Unified Western Grocers
5200 Sheila Street
Commerce, California 90040
Telephone:  (323)264-5200 Extension 4560
Cell:  (323)243-1865
email:  [log in to unmask]  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Records Management Program 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of WALLIS Dwight D
> Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 11:30 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Cost of storage
> 
> Doug - just a word of caution for folks on your cost 
> allocation comment.
> When comparing a cost allocation numbers, you want to make 
> sure you are
> comparing apples and apples. Cost allocation formula are not 
> necessarily
> unit pricing systems. For example, a cost allocation based square
> footage cost may not compare to a unit price to store a cubic foot
> charged by a commercial records center (this is where that 
> fuzzy "usage"
> stuff begins to play a role). The unit price component for square
> footage within that cost allocation formula may work. Or, the cost
> allocation figure would work if both the active and inactive storage
> areas are utilizing the same cost allocation formula. 
> Understanding the
> allocation formula helps ensure apple to apple comparisons.
> 
> The reason I point this out is the cost allocation may be supporting
> functions not directly tied to facility square footage (for 
> example, an
> overall property management function). Changing a storage cost from a
> cost allocation based square footage charge to a unit pricing based
> storage charge may save direct costs, but end up increasing the
> remaining square footage charge due to the need to continue to support
> the supported function. In other words, you may not save the money you
> think you will.
> 
> Dwight Wallis, CRM
> Records Administrator
> Multnomah County Fleet, Records, Electronics, Distribution & Stores
> (FREDS)
> 1620 SE 190th Avenue
> Portland OR 97233
> phone: (503)988-3741
> fax: (503)988-3754
> [log in to unmask]
>  
> 
> List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
> Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance
> 

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2