RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:25:49 -0600
Reply-To:
[log in to unmask]
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Subject:
Append vs. interfile
From:
Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Organization:
IMERGE Consulting
Comments:
RFC822 error: <W> MESSAGE-ID field duplicated. Last occurrence was retained.
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines) 
Hi all, 
 
I am posting this question on behalf of someone not on the list. 
 
We are currently developing standard procedures to manage both electronic
and physical files.  Is it more meaningful to use the word "append" or
"interfiling" in procedures for updating physical and electronic records? Is
there a difference?  We would appreciate feed back from other companies that
have developed filing procedures for physical and electronic records (or
have an opinion). 
 
Any assistance you can provide in response to this query would be most
appreciative. I have my thoughts on this matter but wanted to see if the
list could provide a more definitive response. 
 
Thanks, all!
 
Jesse Wilkins

CDIA+, LIT, ICP, edp, ermM, ecmS

IMERGE Consulting

[log in to unmask]

(303) 574-1455 office

(303) 484-4142 fax

YIM: jessewilkins8511

 

 

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2