<snip>
actually more in favor of more advanced CRM add-ons like NS, but for
e.g.
legal, healthcare, engineering,
<snip>

I definitely support that.  I am not sure if the ARMA ISGs are going
away, but that could be a logical starting point for development of
industry-specific questions and test bank.   Similar to the NIRMA
'nuclear specialist' NS module model.

Best regards, Steve
Steven D. Whitaker, CRM
Records Systems Manager; City of Reno

>>> Jesse Wilkins <[log in to unmask]> 10/02 9:09 PM >>>
As I think about it and review the thread from last year on the list,
I'm
actually more in favor of more advanced CRM add-ons like NS, but for
e.g.
legal, healthcare, engineering, areas where the area of practice really
is
significantly different from the base competency. In the medical
profession
you can be a general practitioner, or you can be board-certified as a
thoracic surgeon, cardiologist, oral surgeon, or probably hundreds of
other
specialties. 

In the world of the ICRM you are a candidate, a CRM, or a CRM/NS. Why
not a
CRM/Eng, CRM/LS, CRM/others, as long as there is a definable body of
knowledge and sufficient expertise to write exam questions? 
(el snippo)

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance