RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Colgan, Julie J." <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 2 Feb 2007 09:35:03 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
John Gervais wrote: <I don't know if anybody is as fed up with acronyms
as I am.  Two sent to me this week were emsg and wiifm (e-mail message
and what's in it for me).  Why can't people just say what they want to
say, instead of writing this way?> snip

John, I totally agree with you and I don't think age has anything to do
with it (unless 34 is now considered ancient!).  The acronyms not only
defeat full text searching and readability, etc. but honestly I think it
is wholly unprofessional.  I shudder to think how my son (who is nearing
7 years old) will communicate as he grows up.  Will he write his thesis
in "generation Z shorthand" too?  I understand there are times and
places for everything - but will my son?

My other pet peeve is using smiley faces in professional communications.
I would never, ever think to put a smiley face in an email to my boss
...  

Julie

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2