RECMGMT-L Archives

Records Management

RECMGMT-L@LISTSERV.IGGURU.US

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:15:40 -0600
Reply-To:
Records Management Program <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From:
Gus Harris <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (63 lines)
Hmmm...interesting to see this.  I was just telling a colleague how it
amazed me that the vendors (major companies) of workflow software don't
do a very effective job of presenting it.  My organization has just gone
through the process of evaluating several imaging/workflow solutions.
We intend to apply a solution enterprise wide...in our major
departments.  We invited several responders to our RFP to come in and do
onsite presentations, etc.  I think several of the products are very
good.  However, not one of the vendors/companies did, in my "records
manager" opinion, a very good job of presenting it.  And we are talking
major dollars here...

I don't understand why they don't spend some bucks on hiring a records
management consultant to help them with developing their presentation so
that the target audience will really understand what "workflow" is and
how it can provide the efficiencies that they tout.

Just my .02 worth here...

Gus Harris
Records Manager
The University of West Florida
Pensacola, FL
[log in to unmask] 

-----Original Message-----
From: Records Management Program [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Colgan, Julie J.
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 3:54 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [RM] Marketing Workflow

Thanks for your thoughts Laurie.  I am in the private law firm industry.
Unfortunately, that approach hasn't worked here (that is what the IT
director has been trying to accomplish but couldn't even get
"exploratory" funding).  I am still pretty new here but it appears to me
that the hold-up isn't necessarily sticker shock, rather it is a
complete lack of an answer to "what's in it for me".  The executives
just aren't grasping what it is or how it really provides a value.

I am taking your approach though by choosing a real pain point to
automate first - our new business intake process.  That process is our
life-blood, the beginning of money coming in the door.  That will appeal
to our attorneys and the Board, however my business case will also
include goodies for our Professional Liability Partner in re: conflicts
checking and other risk mitigation processes, metrics capabilities for
our COO, overtime approvals for our CEO (a current pet project of his)
and other slice of life stuff that they care about.

I am planning to couple the business case with a cost proposal that will
be first-step actionable (meaning it is a high, rough dollar amount that
will be fine-tuned once their commitment is granted).

Thanks again to everyone for your support on this topic and everything
else over the years!

Julie

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

List archives at http://lists.ufl.edu/archives/recmgmt-l.html
Contact [log in to unmask] for assistance

ATOM RSS1 RSS2